Tuesday, January 7, 2014

DO NOT IGNORE THIS INFORMATION, especially those who are fond of Maggi...give ur 2 min to read n share these 7 horrible facts about maggi...

Many of us can't live without " Maggi " especially when one is away from home, in a foreign land. Here is a piece of information to share so that we can remove the potential health hazard of consuming Maggi. Maybe you should print this to keep as a reminder, pin it up in the kitchen.

1. Atta Maggie contains? DSG (DiSodium Glutamate), which does contain Bactosoytone. Not written in ingredients as such, hidden under alias Flavor-627. using Bactosoytone, itself made from soy protein using a catalyst enzyme porcine (taken from intestine of Pig).

2. The current cooking instruction printed on instant noodles label is wrong.
Normally, the way we cook the instant noodles is to put the noodles into a pot with water, throw in the powder and let it cook for around 3 minutes and then it’s ready to eat. (WRONG!)

3. Nestlé have faced criticism over their advertising of the Maggi brand, adhering to marketing regulations in developed countries, but making misleading claims in developing countries where regulation permits it.

4. The dry and crunchy noodles contains wax. It contains wax – able to stay inside body for 4 to 5 days.

5. The advert made false claims that the noodles would “help to build strong muscles, bone and hair”. The British Advertising Standards Authority said that the advert did not abide by the new EU consumer protection legislation, by which advertisers have to provide proof of health claims.

6. One serving (1 block or 100 grams) of noodles contains 1170 mg. of sodium aka salt n all we know SALT is responsible for increase in Blood Pressure and heart patients all over the world.

7. Boiling the separately packaged flavors in water changes the MSG (Monosodium glutamate) to toxic form - 'Silent damage' to the brain...also linked to asthma attacks, cause disabling arthritis, and even serious depressions, behavioral problems in children....
MSG has been found to be more toxic than all other food toxins, poisons and allergens.!!!
http://www.amazon.com/In-Bad-Taste-Symptom-Complex/dp/0929173309/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1331593958&sr=1-1

Maggi is Non Veg - - -try this experiment at home

Boil chicken maggi soup powder and vegetarian maggi noodles masala powder

After boiling, taste both of them....they will taste the same...all the best

Think about it...



Well, this is what is made into your orders in Mc Donalds... oh sorry.. I meant, McShit... this is what you are eating..Oh btw,many microscopic particles,synthetic materials were found in the McD products when viewed through microscope...
For an analogy,whenever you eat Mcshit,just remember you are eating the same substance found in yoga mats.

Tuesday, December 3, 2013


High Price doesn't always mean high quality & Low price doesn’t always mean low quality


Adidas - poor quality and damage in 4 month
Adidas Shoes - Manufacturing defect within 5 months
Adidas Shoes - Shoe cracked within week
Adidas Shoes, Puyallup, Washington - shoes fell apart
Adidas - complaining against poor service in the stores and talking badly

I had purchased a pair of shoe on 21-7-2012 from adi sports (1) pvt ltd, shop no 126 in G.I.P MALL.Shoes became damaged due to normal use.i have complained on 22-11-2012 and sent it for quality check.Now he told me this shoes didn't approved for quality check because of missus.He is not giving me a positive response.3000 Rs/- is not a small amount.Store keeper is called me on 30-11-2011 and said please take return it without any maintenance.

customer name- MAMTA Tripathi
customer form no-3315
-------------------------------------
I purchased a pair of shoes from Adidas showroom at Big Bazar Rave Moti Rawatpur Kanpur Show Room before 5 months approx, Bill no. sc12/454 stock no. 4050955568502 purchase date 16th June, 2012 and send for repairing date 27 Nov., 2012 but Repairer does not do proper result for repairing of show and again shoe damages at different places, he has taken courier charges in place of repairing charges of Rs. 250.00 + 10.00 had been charged by the Show room of Rave Moti Kanpur. You are most humbly requested to please repair / replace the shoes or any other relief which deem fit may kindly be given otherwise I will file the suit against the company in Consumer Forum of Kanpur for any problem / query you will be responsible and please contact me over my phone no. 09453287350 so very kind of you. My contact address : Sri Maan Singh, 249/9, Shastri Nagar Kanpur Nagar.
Hope you will take appropriate action in the matter without further delay for better relation of customer and owner of Shop.

With kind regards
Maan singh
India
------------------------------
I was given a pair of Golf shoes for christmas from my wife, as a woman ha ha she had got her father to get them for me. As I am new to the sport, my first outing was in May the bank holiday weekend, the first time i wore them, I put them on with pride, and after only 9 holes i returned to my car only to notice that all the leather???? had cracked and was peeling away from the right shoe only, yes it was wet but are the shoes made for all weathers???? Iam very disgusted to say the least AFTER only one game pf golf.
I am no longer possession of the receipt for these shoes, can somthing be done ?

Alan Bland
Morecambe, Lancashire, England
United Kingdom
http://www.complaintsboard.com/profile-149519
-------------------------------
I had purchased ADIDAS shoes from their patna showroom (in front of mauryalok ) when i started wearing the shoe it got torn apart and cracked in few days much to my surprise as never imagine that a shoe costing rs2000... and from WORLD NO2 Shoe mfgr become unwearable in a week! Since i have lost the receipt as the name ADIDAS IS sufficient guarantee who cares about receipt. The shoe is still lying in my garage much to the astonoishment of my friends and guest...

Ravi Pratap
-----------------------------
I purchase a pair of Adadis shoes Freemont Mid G49739 UNIRED/UNIRED/BLACK 41-14596-1-04 size 10 1/2
from footlocker shoe store at the south hill mall puyallupfor my grandson on July 2nd 2013. Shoes fell apart and on Sept 20, took the shoes back to foot locker and was told that they could do nothing. I needed to contact the manafacture. The shoes did not last and I would like a refund or a new pair of shoes. I paid $54.59. Very disapointed.
Thank you for your time
Theresa Golden
14327 106th ave ct e
Puyallup, Washington 98374
253 446-7577
tag1953@hotmail.com
---------------------------------
I have purchased a shoes worth of rupees 3800 / - from Adidas showroom before 2 months ago but they got spoiled from the frontend and when I went to replace it the owner is miss behaving and said do whatever you want but we are not not going to replace it because its not a company mistake .

Can you please help me ....... please
My contact details is
abhi1986_maa@yahoo.com

You can email me . I will reply it or you can can call me on 08144805997

Regards
Abhimanyu...
-----------------------------
Respected sir / madam

I visited one of the adidas outlet in Hanumangarh pin: 335513 . I bought a t-shirt from there . I told them that there is dust here so they told tell where it is and started talking badly and when we had bought the tshirt told me and my friends to get out . This is really unacceptable that when you are shopping from such a brand and they recieve you like this in a store . Not only this when I called the customer care of adidas he cut my phone in the middle when I was complaining and second time when I called the same man picked the phone and started a conversationike...

Parth bishnoi Mar 27, 2013
----------------------------------
source: http://www.consumercomplaints.in/bycompany/adidas-a20346.html

McDonald's serving up 'restructured meat technology' - you want fries with that?


EVERY PACK OF CIGARETTES YOU BUY YOU FUNDS CRUEL ANIMAL TESTING...STOP SMOKING...DO IT FOR YOURSELF DO IT FOR THE ANIMALS...





About cruel Torturous Tests...

In tests that many people don't realize are still being conducted, animals are forced to breathe cigarette smoke for up to six hours straight, every day, for as long as three years. Animals naturally avoid breathing cigarette smoke, so lab rats are forced into tiny canisters, and cigarette smoke is pumped directly into their noses. In the past, dogs and monkeys have had tubes attached to holes in their necks or have had masks strapped to their faces to force smoke into their lungs. In other commonly conducted tests, mice and rats have cigarette tar applied directly to their bare skin to induce the growth of skin tumors.

Specific examples of cigarette experiments include the following:

• In a study to test the effects of adding ingredients such as honey, sugar, molasses, plum juice, lime oil, chocolate, cocoa, and coffee extract to cigarettes, experimenters with Philip Morris stuffed thousands of rats into tiny canisters that pumped tobacco smoke directly into their noses six hours a day for 90 consecutive days. The rats were then killed and dissected to examine the harm caused to their bodies.
• To test the effects of using high-fructose corn syrup to flavor cigarettes, experimenters at R.J. Reynolds spread cigarette tar on the skin of more than 1,000 mice and rats and then forced them to breathe cigarette smoke. Many of the mice who had tar spread on their skin died during the study. Other mice had their skin peel off, and they developed skin tumors. All the surviving animals were killed and dissected
• Philip Morris experimenters subjected 1,000 rats to two years of breathing either diesel engine exhaust or secondhand cigarette smoke for six hours a day, seven days a week, just to compare the effects of the exposure on their lungs.
• Experimenters hired by Lorillard Tobacco (the maker of Newport and other brands of cigarettes) forced rats to breathe cigarette smoke for three hours a day for five days and then killed them and cut them open to see if the exposure had harmed their lungs.

**To DOUBLE YOU IMPACT,WHAT YOU CAN ALSO DO :
To quote the National Cancer Institute, "There is no safe tobacco product."(15) We already know from clinical research—and from basic common sense—that smoking is bad for us. If you still use tobacco products, seek out companies such as Imperial Tobacco, Nat Sherman, and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco that have official policies against testing their products on animals.
If the tobacco industry wants to continue developing and marketing products that cause addiction and kill people, it should do so without the help of the government and without harming animals. You can write to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and request that it follow the lead of agencies in progressive countries by banning tobacco product and ingredient tests on animals:

When you Buy Colgate Products............This happen for you Every Purchased...Product Testing on Non-human Animals



Product Testing on Non-human Animals





please read this so that u gotta know what they do n how they do...even the scientists working in this animal testing labs don't aware of this...the cosmetic companies hiding these facts frm everyone from more than 100 years...
Guys this is not...a joke or any false propaganda against cosmetic products
please read this -------->

Taking it over to a sanitised laboratory bench, Dr Tamsin Decker supervises as solution is squirted into the defenceless animal’s eyes. She has done this many times before — and will watch as it’s done again until the rabbit shows some side-effects: pain, irritation, bleeding perhaps, and eventually, possibly, blindness.

For what cause must the animal endure such a wretched, tortured existence? Once upon a time, Dr Decker would have imagined it was to find a cure for cancer, or, at the very least, to test a compound which would relieve suffering.
But now the young woman knows that she is verifying the safety of a chemical contained in toothpaste — a well-established brand leader that she had used to brush her teeth that very morning.

According to Dr Katy Taylor, BUAV’s senior scientific adviser
Even though animal testing on cosmetics was banned in the UK in 1997 and across Europe in 2009, I found that Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Colgate and Gillette contained ingredients that were tested on animals only recently.
I asked Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Colgate and the Turtle Wax Corporations, manufacturers of the affected items, how they felt about their ingredients being tested under REACH.
Only Procter & Gamble replied, saying they tests on animals & none of the other companies even replied to me...
-----------------------------------------------
My dear friends i'm not interested in any legal action against these companies b'coz these companies got even more powerful than ever...then how we can stop all this ???
i have simple solution "DON'T BUY ANY PRODUCT OF THESE COMPANIES"...b'coz every penny loss will show them the real power of us...mind it we r not slaves of these companies Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Colgate and Gillette...

Vishal's Facebook Badge